As a parent of a Northampton elementary school student, I respect the emphasis on fiscal health that letter writer John Frey has made. [“School Committee must practice prudent fiscal management,” Gazette, May 10]. But focusing solely on our city's AAA bond rating overlooks important education funding needs. While high bond ratings certainly reduce borrowing costs for capital projects, they do not address the ongoing operational needs of schools or the quality of education provided. I understand concerns about school boards using lump sum funds for recurring expenses. However, this should not be considered bad budget management. Rather, it is a necessary response to a long-standing pattern of underinvestment in education by city government, exacerbated by the Chapter 70 formula that puts us at a disadvantage. Investing in our public education system secures the future of our communities. Well-funded schools lead to a more skilled workforce and improved community well-being. For example, increasing Chapter 70 funding could address or alleviate recurring gaps, reduce reliance on local funding, and provide more sustainable solutions. Prioritizing questionable capital projects like Picture Main Street should not undermine the essential need for strong education funding, whether externally funded or not. Our children deserve a budget that reflects our commitment to their future, not just our city infrastructure. This is a critical moment to make any necessary corrections. I am confident that a budget that is representative of our community's values is possible, one that prioritizes educational excellence alongside fiscal responsibility. This balanced approach is the only way to ensure the future success of our children and our city. The school board did not fulfill its responsibility, but they met the moment.
christopher lucas
northampton