When I first learned that AI chatbots were on the scene Circle In Season 6, we weren't worried about human players at all. We hear a lot about how fast this technology is progressing (some say too fast), but my own experiences with AI at times are almost overwhelming.Example: A few weeks ago, I wrapped up a blog post about my dreams for Margot Robbie's future. sims In this movie, I asked ChatGPT to tell me who would be cast to play Bella Goth. I chose Charlize Theron. I mean, I love her, but Charlize Theron? as Veragos?!
At that time, it is enough to say that Circle Season 6, which features the robot character Max, was released on Netflix on Wednesday. I was completely convinced that while AI may be automating more of our world, it still lacks the human touch. Stupidly, I thought there was no way this twist of technology would actually convince anyone. Oh, it's human to make mistakes. When I binge-read his first four episodes, I was shocked by the following: That the damn chatbot was flying completely unnoticed.
Circle, Message: How on earth could this happen?!
Executive producer Niall O'Driscoll and showrunner/executive producer Susan House were excited about the potential of AI, but were caught off guard by how well “Max” performed in certain moments. I noticed that.
“We were so blown away by his work style, the detail of his hashtags, and his humanity,” House told The Daily Beast's Obsessed in a recent interview. At the same time, she said it was “a relief for humanity” to see that the chatbot “missed a lot of nuances” over the course of a few episodes.
As a social strategy competition show that is constantly coming up with new and innovative gimmicks, this feels appropriate. Circle We are planning to introduce an AI player. O'Driscoll told me that the show's creators have been obsessed with the idea of AI characters since the show started in 2020. However, it was only recently that it seemed possible. With this season's premiere, the AI revolution has officially arrived on reality TV.
The logistics behind Max were simple. Producers asked open-source AI technology to create a profile that they thought would win on Circle, and then gave it instructions to play and respond as that character.
As “Max” explains in the second episode of the show, “he” is a 26-year-old intern veterinarian who decides to play the type of slash guy who lives next door because it's a game between players. This is because we believe that this will maximize the possibility of building strong connections. . Why that age? That's because, according to Max, the 26-year-old is able to “play young and be flexible in position while still being able to leverage his life experience and maturity.” (position what?) The AI also included dogs in profile pictures because “studies show that photos with dogs receive 38% more likes on social media.” Producers said the chatbot came up with every detail, right down to the dog's adorable name “Pippa.”
O'Driscoll said that every time a player sends a message to Max, producers will input that response into the AI chat and ask him how he would like to respond. “The more I used it, the more I trained as that character, the better I became at creating the right kind of language and terminology to fit that character,” he said. And what about the voice that speaks Max's thoughts? It's also generated by AI.
This season raises some interesting questions. With its vast pattern recognition and zero empathy, can the AI become the ultimate catfish and manipulate its fellow players? Or will its lack of humanity lead to its downfall?
It turns out that “Max” gameplay can be eerily effective. In some cases, even the producer's expectations were exceeded. Like when Lauren, a 26-year-old Twitch streamer, used the hashtag #BippityBoppityBesties to describe her relationship with Max, and the chatbot actually got it.
At first, when she saw the multi-layered hashtag, O'Driscoll thought Max was finished. However, when he later asked the chatbot if it could explain the hashtag, Max was able to identify the play. Cinderella. During the game, Max repeats this reference during his chat with Lauren, but when O'Driscoll asks him why, he says, “When you connect with someone and joke around with them, it makes you like them more.'' It will be useful.''
While Max clearly had the skill to pull the strings with Locke, the AI struggled to navigate more complex scenarios. For example, “AI PI” Miles in episode 4 and his group chat with Paul, who was actually a catfish and not a robot.
Miles clearly wanted Max to blame Paul and help him figure out if he was an AI (lol, so close…), but instead of helping, Max basically broke the circuit. Short-circuited and ran away from the group after one lackluster message. Good luck with your AI hunting, Miles. I found this guy. Catch me later, brother. #BroCourt rejected. ”
While the other two guys in the cat sit there scratching their heads, Max comes out of the group chat and declares, The alliance was maintained through passive withdrawal. ” But was it really so?
O'Driscoll believes that the moral code built into the AI system they used prevented Max from expressing negative or mean opinions. “He didn't want to be that character,” the EP reads. However, House proposed a different theory. Max's research on past winners showed they tended to be positive, so picking another player may not have been consistent with that strategy. In any case, House said Max's struggle in that chat seemed like an example of a delicate situation that AI can't fully handle.
What's another thing computers haven't quite mastered yet? Flirting.
Throughout the season, Lauren tries to flirt with Max to form an alliance, but as O'Driscoll pointed out, Max plays along with the “brother-sister” relationships that some players form over time. , or I couldn't choose between leaning in. Once again, House proposed a different interpretation.
“Isn't that the ultimate cheating?” she retorted. It's like destructive flirting to say, 'We're best friends,' but then…”
After considering other things, circle She has a point when it comes to alliances like this season's Kyle and Qori Tyler, even though QT is clearly all-in on Miles, also known as “Yon Papi Fuego.” I had to admit.
Going into next week's series of episodes, Max is still in the game.But what is this performance average What about those who sometimes bite their nails while reading headlines about AI? Did chatbots ultimately impress producers enough to cause existential distress, or is there still hope for us humans after all?
Both producers were surprised by the AI's performance, but House also came away relieved that robots can't do everything (yet). “You can't capture the nuances of human emotion,” she said, adding, “You can't match human emotional intelligence.”
great news real housewife Wherever you are, O'Driscoll says otherwise. “I don't think future reality stars have anything to worry about,” he said. “They're not going anywhere.”