The federal government is working to disaggregate data on Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders. Additionally, outdated expressions have been removed from the guidelines.
For the first time since 1997, the Office of Management and Budget has revised Statistical Policy Directive No. 15, which sets guidelines for how federal agencies should collect, maintain, and report data on race and ethnicity. However, there is no requirement for government agencies to collect such data.
OMB has made several changes to SPD-15, including adding Middle East or North Africa (MENA) as a minimum reporting category. References such as “Orient”, “Far East”, and “Indian subcontinent” have also been removed. The AANHPI organization welcomes these changes.
“These terms are not only inaccurate, they have contributed to the narrative that Asian Americans are permanent aliens in the United States,” the Asian American Children and Families Coalition (CACF) said in a press release. stated in the release.
Under the new guidelines, agencies that collect data on race and ethnicity will be required to go beyond the minimum categories. For example, respondents are provided with the following additional categories that correspond to the minimum category “Asian.”
- Chinese
- asian indian
- Filipino
- Vietnamese
- Korean
- with Japanese people,
- Another group (Pakistani, Hmong, Afghan, etc.)
In addition to “Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander,” the following categories are offered:
- native hawaiian
- Samoan
- Chamorro
- Tongan
- Fijian
- Marshallese
- Another group (such as Chuukese, Palauans, Tahitians, etc.)
The AANHPI organization has praised the new guidelines, but has also expressed skepticism about their implementation.
“SEARAC is working to increase the visibility of Southeast Asian communities, including identifying Vietnamese as one of the detailed communities for data collection and including the Hmong as an example of another group within the Asian racial category. We commend OMB and the Administration for this revision, which represents progress,” said SEARAC Executive Director Quyen Dinh.
“However, we are disappointed that this regulation does not go further to require additional collection of Cambodian, Laotian, Mien, and many other Southeast Asian ethnic data through a write-in option as the default standard. We are also concerned about the option for institutions to opt out of detailed race and ethnicity data collection requirements, which would lump all Asian ethnicity data into one category. SEARAC and our partners are committed to working with the federal government to help our nation go beyond these minimum requirements and give visibility to the long-standing needs of our communities.”
CACF also said it was concerned about the agency's focus on collecting data on the largest ethnic groups rather than smaller ethnic groups.
SPD 15 states that “unless the agency determines that the potential benefits of detailed data do not justify the additional burden to the agency and the public, or the additional risk to privacy or confidentiality, and therefore requests an exemption. Requires the collection of data that exceeds the minimum category of “Oira.'' ” It is unclear how authorities will determine whether there are sufficient benefits to justify an “additional burden.”
AsAmNews is published by Asian American Media Inc., a nonprofit organization. Follow us on Facebook, X, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. Please consider making a tax-deductible donation to support our efforts to produce diverse content about the AAPI community. We are supported in part by funding provided by the State of California. california state library In partnership with California Department of Social Services And that California Commission on Asian Pacific Islander American Affairs as part of please stop the hate program. To report a hate incident or crime and receive support, please visit: CA vs Hate.