of times sued Microsoft for copying its story and using its data to imitate its style, but Microsoft's lawyers now say OpenAI's large-scale language models could also potentially lead to copyright infringement. It claims to be just the latest in a series of technologies that are considered legal regardless of the circumstances. “Despite the Times' claims, copyright law is no more a barrier to large-scale language models than it is to VCRs (or player pianos, photocopiers, personal computers, the Internet, or search engines).” There is one passage.
Ian Crosbie, partner and lead attorney at Sussman Godfrey times, To tell The Verge Microsoft did not dispute that it worked with OpenAI to copy the publication's articles. “VCR manufacturers are strangely comparing LLM to VCRs, even though they have never claimed that large-scale piracy was necessary to make their products,” Crosby said. .
Microsoft also filed an objection. Times” Alleging that Microsoft knowingly induced users to infringe on copyright by providing products that use OpenAI's GPT model. times No examples of direct infringement by Copilot users are ever cited. “Thus, the Times' contributory infringement theory fails on the very same basis that the VCR challenge failed 40 years ago: it seeks to unfairly impose liability on the basis of 'only.' [on] “Design or distribute a product that has substantial lawful use,” Microsoft's complaint states.
Microsoft also claims that times We did not prove that Microsoft violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) by intentionally removing copyright management information, such as the name of the copyright owner, from the training data. Microsoft noted other generative AI lawsuits that use the same arguments as this lawsuit. times If those claims had been rejected, Like those brought to you by writers including Sarah Silverman,